GAO Report on Power Morcellators

//GAO Report on Power Morcellators

GAO Report on Power Morcellators

Drs. Amy Reed and Hooman Noorchashm and children, from Philadelphia Magazine

Mesh Medical Device News Desk, February 10, 2017 ~ The GAO report on power morcellators finds there were 25 requests to market new power morcellator devices submitted to the FDA over a 23 year period, all were cleared for the marketplace. 


The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has just issued a report (here) on the use of power morcellators. Power morcellators are used during “minimally invasive” surgery on women to grind up uterine fibroids.

The alternative is an abdominal hysterectomy or removal of fibroids, which a larger incision.

During the morcellation process, undetected, hidden cancers can be spread throughout the body cavity, as was the case with Dr. Amy Reed. She and her husband, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, both medical doctors with six childeren, have headed an aggressive campaign to get morcellators off the market, however, they remain in use with some awareness by the FDA and users.

Power morcellator, Drugwatch

This report finds the FDA system has failed this couple and hundreds of Americans.  Read their  story here.

Instead of a one in 10,000 chance of a undetected cancer as previously thought, the risk is now thought to be one in 350. There are 50,000 power morcellator procedures a year, reports the GAO.

Had Dr. Reed’s aggressive cancer been removed whole, she would have a 50% survival rate at five years. Instead, after the morcellator spread cancer debris within her body, those chance of survival drop from 0 to 20%.

From 1991 to 2014, there were 25 submissions for laparoscopic power morcellators to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. They were all cleared for market through the 510(k) fast-track clearance process. Manufacturers include  Cook, Gynecare, Cuto, SKEA Steiner and FemRx, among others.

All of them had the same intended use, to pulverize fibroids in order to remove them from the uterus. A uterine sarcoma is a cancer of the muscle and supportive tissue. Less than 4% of uterine cancers are uterine sarcomas, finds the GAO.

Leiomyosarcoma is a type of uterine cancer difficult to diagnose because it resembles fibroids.  That is the cancer Dr. Reed has been fighting since her diagnosis of a stage 4 cancer following her power morcellator procedure.

An FDA safety communication in November 2014 issued guidance to doctors and to manufacturers to add a boxed warning.

In 2014, the FDA discouraged the use of power morcellators in hysterectomys or myomectomys (removal of fibroids).

By July 2014, the FDA convened an expert panel overseeing morcellators.

By December 2015, the FDA inspected select hospitals with high numbers of adverse event reports of injuries from the morcellators. They found a failure to report adverse events within the time frames required and a lapse in maintaining files on medical devices.

The GAO concludes the medical device reporting system is “passive” and relies on doctors and manufacturers to identify harm. Before November 2014, doctors or hospitals would not consider the spread of an unsuspected cancer following  a power morcellator procedure to be a reportable adverse event.

Since September 2016, the FDA has identified 285 adverse event reports of spreading cancer following a power morcellation.

From Philadelphia Magazine: But as always in this couple’s struggle, it’s one step forward, one step back. As noted by the New York Times, the GAO report comes just as the Trump administration has called for loosening, not tightening, regulations for approval of drugs and medical devices. “Instead of being 9,000 pages, it’ll be 100 pages,” Trump promised of FDA regs.


By |2017-02-10T13:47:57+00:00February 10th, 2017|FDA News|2 Comments

About the Author:

I’m National News Editor, Jane Akre and I began Mesh Medical Device News Desk aka Mesh News Desk (MND) in the summer of 2011 just after the Food and Drug Administration issued an explicit warning to the public that complications associated with surgical mesh used for prolapse repair (POP) and incontinence (SUI) are NOT rare! That was the starting point for the litigation you see today and thousands of lawsuits have been filed by women whose lives have been altered, some permanently, by the use of this petroleum-based product.


  1. Renee McLaughlin April 5, 2017 at 3:02 pm - Reply

    I am trying to find help for my cousin who had the ProdeGen mesh implant a few years ago, and is now experiencing major medical problems. Please advise on where to start researching for a solution or removel of device.
    Thank You Very Much,
    Renee McLaughlin.

    • Jane Akre April 5, 2017 at 7:31 pm - Reply

      You must mean ProteGen by Boston Scientific which was taken off the market in 1999. Try Dr. Raz at UCLA if you are on the west coast… or Dr Una Lee in Seattle… otherwise write me and I will give you more names.

Leave A Comment