What Happened to the FDA Request for Transvaginal Mesh Studies?

//What Happened to the FDA Request for Transvaginal Mesh Studies?

What Happened to the FDA Request for Transvaginal Mesh Studies?

September 19, 2012 ~ Last January, after a five-fold increase in complications was noted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concerning synthetic mesh used in women to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), the FDA ordered mesh makers to find out why.

At the time, the unprecedented request was seen as the agency flexing of its muscle, which it has the authority to do under Section 522.

“The 522 Postmarket Surveillance Studies Program encompasses design, tracking, oversight, and review responsibilities for studies mandated under section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The program helps ensure that well-designed 522 postmarket surveillance (PS) studies are conducted effectively and efficiently and in the least burdensome manner.”

Least burdensome” refers to the medical device manufacturer, not the patient who may have suffered injuries associated with that medical device.

Altogether the January 3 orders would encompass:

* 88 postmarket study orders to 33 manufacturers of urogynecologic surgical mesh for POP; and

* 11 postmarket study orders to seven manufacturers of single-incision mini-slings for SUI.

The studies were to answer some of the following questions about the severe and life-altering complications that were emerging among women treated for the relatively minor conditions of POP and SUI.

The mesh makers were to find out: the rates of mesh exposure, mesh erosion into another organ, pelvic pain, infection, dyspareunia, vaginal shortening, vaginal scarring, vaginal bleeding, fistula formation, neuromuscular problems, revision surgeries, quality of life, and recurrence of the problem, among other issues.

Women were to be followed for three years and adverse events reported at 6 months, 12, 18, 24 and 36.

Transvaginal and surgical mesh is not required to undergo safety and efficacy studies before it is marketed (under the agency’s 510(k) notification process), so these studies would provide the first look at what was going wrong.

MDND background story on mesh makers who received 522 orders here.

See a PDF link to two letters:

Letter –  POP 522 Order – final – generic (2)-3 (pdf)

Letter –  SUI 522 Order – final – generic (2)-1 (pdf)

“Within 30 days of receipt of this order, you must submit your plan to conduct postmarket surveillance of your device to the address listed below.”

So What’s Happened?

A look at the website that follows the 522 plans (here) submitted by makers of various kinds of devices shows not much has happened.

“Plan pending”  ‘Plan Overdue”  “Other” and “Study Pending” indicate that postmarket surveillance does not happen quickly.

In addition when Ethicon, a division of Johnson & Johnson, announced in June it would remove four Gynecare meshes from the market, it also requested the agency abandon its request for the postmarket plans for those four – the TVT Secur, Prosima Pelvic Floor Repair System, Prolift Pelvic Floor Repair System, and the Prolift MTM Pelvic Floor Repair System.

In the case of metal-on-metal hip implant studies, requested in May 2011 for medical devices associated with a high failure rate, these too do not appear to be underway or have complied with the FDA 522 order, in that they say “plan overdue.”



The FDA Responds

Sarah Clark-Lynn of the FDA’s Public Affairs Office told MDND last Friday, June 8, that the agency has “received Ethicon’s request and they have 60 days to respond.”

That means the FDA had until August 4th to issue an answer to Ethicon about the requirement to do expensive and time-consuming studies on four meshes it was planning to discontinue, though phasing out over the next 120 days.

Recently Clark-Lynn explained what the various designations mean:

MDND Q: What does ‘plan pending,’ ‘study pending’ and ‘other’ mean? 

Plan Pending FDA has not approved the study plan, and it has been less than 6 months since issuance of the order.
Plan Overdue FDA has not approved the study plan, and it has been 6 months or more since issuance of the order.
Study Pending The plan has been approved, but no subjects have been enrolled.
Other The study status does not fit another category (e.g., change in ownership underway, redesigning device and need prior premarket clearance/approval to use in study, device has been cleared or approved but is not currently marketed). This is an interim study status.

Q: Since the various mesh makers had a limited time to get back to the FDA with a 522 study proposal, is there any action taken for non compliance?


“In January 2012, the FDA issued 99 orders for postmarket surveillance studies to manufacturers of surgical mesh used for as subset of treatments for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Manufacturers were required to submit a research protocol to the FDA that addresses specific safety issued related to these devices and outlined in the order. The FDA has received submissions from companies with these devices.

“As we move forward, the FDA will take the necessary compliance action when necessary.”

Q: How many of the 99 orders/ how many companies/ have submitted 522 study plans to the satisfaction of the FDA?

“No submitted plans have been approved by FDA. The companies and FDA are working toward getting plans approved.”

Q: How do you define ‘out of compliance’ and what actions could be taken?

“The failure to have an approved postmarket surveillance plan or failure to conduct postmarket surveillance in accordance with the approved plan constitutes failure to comply with section 522 of the act. This may lead to actions such as seizure of product, injunction, prosecution, and/or civil money penalties.”

Q: It sounds like the request is being granted, but I don’t like to speculate. As of today, has the FDA granted Ethicon’s request not to have to produce 522 plans for its Gynecare products? The FDA had until August 4th to get back to Ethicon – Did it send a letter?  Is it online or can I obtain it? 

“FDA did send letters to Ethicon in response to their requests. FDA is amenable to Ethicon’s requests and is working with Ethicon based on the requests that were made. Please contact Ethicon to see if they would like to comment.”

Q: Can I see a copy of the FDA’s letter to Ethicon which requested a pass on conducting the 522 studies? Can you scan it to me or is it available online? Since this was generated by the FDA, I think going to the agency is the appropriate place to make that request.

“You can request the letter through the FDA’s FOIA office.”

Q: When do you think these submitted 522 plans will be approved? Now that we are 9 months past the 522 request, what is the time frame by either the FDA or the manufacturers to be in compliance, or is there any time frame?

“We review each submission as it is provided to the FDA and make determinations for each one individually.”

Q: Can the public have access to the “plan,” even through a FIOA request?

“The plans are proprietary information for the company. You may request them from the companies. In addition, you may submit a FOIA request for approved study plans and the non-proprietary information may be shared in that manner. You can find information on how to submit a request on our website.”

Q: Has a mesh manufacturer ever had its products seized, been subject to an injunction, been prosecuted or paid civil penalties?

”Given your deadline, I suggest searching the news releases posted on our website.”



By |2017-04-20T12:55:49+00:00September 19th, 2012|FDA News|5 Comments

About the Author:

I’m National News Editor, Jane Akre and I began Mesh Medical Device News Desk aka Mesh News Desk (MND) in the summer of 2011 just after the Food and Drug Administration issued an explicit warning to the public that complications associated with surgical mesh used for prolapse repair (POP) and incontinence (SUI) are NOT rare! That was the starting point for the litigation you see today and thousands of lawsuits have been filed by women whose lives have been altered, some permanently, by the use of this petroleum-based product.


  1. EH September 19, 2012 at 5:58 pm - Reply

    WHAT? Are you kidding? How can anyone just ignore the seriousness of all the suffering going on due to these products? Big pharma monies talk, I guess we’ve figured that out. But considering the amount of litigation going on right now you’d think they might want to cover themselves a little better than giving you the run around. I’ve tried “searching” the FDA site many times and it is very difficult to find things. I wrote to the head of the FDA and he replied that one of his priorities was increasing trasnsparency to the public. Was that lip service? I’m still paying (physically) for a TVT-O (2 arms) for SUI (which by the way has supposedly “manageable side effects”). I am furious with our whole medical system, our government and lack of accountability. The apathy at every level is very evident. I’m about to face surgery #8, and have no idea of where I’ll be after that. My life has been destroyed, and I think we’re seeing the burying of heads in the sand hoping this will all just blow over and disappear. Good luck with that – the longer we go the more casualities will show up. There are many walking “time-bombs” out there. I hope they get this figured out soon.

  2. julie s July 12, 2016 at 3:54 pm - Reply

    I had this tfs sling put in and can not
    find a attorney to take my case anywhere . I had it put in the Minneapolis university of Minnesota. She my doctor about killed me with this sling, I have had 10 transvagingal sling surgeries they removed some of the sling a 6 x 2 part and not one attorney will mess with this tfs sling issue. Peter Perteros. He is a awful person that invented this sling it was never appoved for this use in the united states when I had it put in and only appoved for the use in the state of texas at that time. ect. I am not even able to walk hardly I am at the age of 49 years old and am about
    handicapped over it. I just wanted to get my story out there. thank you . Julie

    • Jane Akre July 12, 2016 at 7:10 pm - Reply

      Witt has a Minneapolis law firm….. Respectfully submitted,
      s/ Charles J. Lloyd
      Charles. J. Lloyd, #174257
      2520 University Avenue S.E.
      Suite 202
      Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
      Tel: (612) 825-7777
      CASE 0:16-cv-01042-JRT-BRT Document 1 Filed 04/21/16 Page 28 of 29
      Fax: (612) 825-3977

      • julie s July 13, 2016 at 6:22 am - Reply

        Thank you so much !! 🙂 I appreciate it
        so much.

Leave A Comment