Free Case Evaluation
Connect
With Us

Pain for Profit Alleges AMS and Reuters

Rep. Bob Goodlatte

Mesh Medical Device News Desk, March 20, 2017 ~ Women Undergo Pain for Profit?  Those are the allegations of Reuters writer, Alison Frankel who writes a column ‘On the Case’ for Reuters.

Alison Frankel writes On the Case for for Reuters.  On March 13 she writes about Rep. Bob Goodlatte, a Virginia Republican who wants to stop the aggressive marketing by personal injury attorneys, the same folks who advertise for injured mesh clients through late night television ads with 800 numbers.

Many women at trial have told juries that was the first indication they had that their numerous complications might be linked to their pelvic mesh implant after doctors routinely denied there could be any link.

Here is her story.

The legislator sent letters to American Bar Association and to each state bar and the District of Columbia. Here is a press release urging common sense reforms be imposed on trial attorneys.

The representative also sent a letter to the Relion Group which places those tv advertisements.

The article cites the 1977 Bates v. State Bar of Arizona that cites the First Amendment which allows lawyers to advertise for personal injury clients.

Frankel and her reporting partner once focused on pelvic mesh and specifically American Medical Systems which launched an aggressive inquiry into mass tort lead generators. Specifically, according to AMS attorneys,

Law Firm HQ improperly solicited clients to file mesh claims and worked with a medical funding outfit to lure mesh plaintiffs into unnecessary surgery in order to obtain bigger settlements.”


Without citing an example, other than because AMS says so, Frankel lets this column stand.

Here is her previous news on how women were “lured into needless surgeries.”

Here is a MND story on  what AMS alleges.

Rep. Goodlatte wants to know how plaintiffs and law firms work with Relion and is asking for copies of the company’s active contracts with plaintiffs’ lawyers.

As a member of the House Judiciary Committee, he’s given the Relion executive to respond by March 21.  Stay tuned. ###

12 Comments

  1. daniee says:

    Seriously, Let’s have your wife or may be a sister or daughter , to get this “marvelous devise” implanted, and I bet Mr. Goodlatte your opinion in this issue will change. The mesh is a failed product. THE WHOLE MESH CONCEPT IS A MESS

  2. daniee says:

    This devise-product-concept is a weapon of mass destruction.

  3. Kitty says:

    The way I see it .. Mr.Goodlette et al. sees us as prostitutes and the advertising lawyers as pimps. THE JOHNS WOULD BE THE DOCS that remove.

  4. Anon says:

    The answers to my questions after dialing that 800 # gave me a piece of mind and ultimately saved my life.

  5. Patient Advocate says:

    Maybe each woman could write him about the life altering harm of AMS mesh.

    https://goodlatte.house.gov/contact/

    • Kitty says:

      No doubt he is a deaf empty suited stiff

    • claudia L says:

      unfortunately I live in Florida with a case since 2013 and with a ridiculous offers and 3 surgeries and the 4 is coming my attorney Lieff Cabraser after the offer they have been changing the paralegals and i don”t get news from them just ones a year

  6. Mart says:

    This guy doesn’t know the half of what’s going on he acts like the money for these claims are coming out of his pocket how about someone takes his scrotum and put them in a bunch of mesh and see how he would feel after constant pain and repeating infections

  7. joni lejeune says:

    I have had and mesh since 2004. it has destroyed my life . period. me and my husband separated for 13yrs.because I can’t have sex. it is too painful.

  8. Concerned citizen says:

    Public information about failed medical devices, and answers to questions that you need to know as a consumer about such medical devices should never be wrong. To obtain medical procedures as advised by a Doctor to repair problems caused by such medical devises is the legal right of the consumer. The funding for such procedures, how ever the consumer can find and obtain through third party funding that is not a law firm representing a client should never be a problem to anyone. The quality of life for the injured consumers should be the utt most concern for all involved. Any politically motivated persons using this subject as a platform to look stately as a savior to the corporations that back there campaign funds should be brought to light and let the voters know the truth about where that individual stand ( for the corporations or the people AKA the consumers).

  9. D macs says:

    The attorneys that are supposed to be representing us are raping us of our money from these lawsuits… don’t bother accepting the lawsuit… they take 60% or more

    • Jane Akre says:

      D- please let me know what you are referring to, some examples would be helpful. I would write about them and omit your names to protect you.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

© 2016 - 2017 Mesh Newsdesk. All rights reserved.
This is a Sundown Legal Marketing law firm website.