J & J Execs to be Deposed About Vaginal Mesh – What Did They Know – When Did They Know It

//J & J Execs to be Deposed About Vaginal Mesh – What Did They Know – When Did They Know It

J & J Execs to be Deposed About Vaginal Mesh – What Did They Know – When Did They Know It

Alex Gorsky, CEO J & J

July 29, 2012 ~ Johnson & Johnson’s new CEO is on the hot seat. Alex Gorsky must show up to provide a videotaped deposition concerning the upcoming Ethicon transvaginal mesh lawsuits pending before a New Jersey Superior Court.

Ethicon is a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.

The decision to require Gorsky and two other executives to testify was made by the Honorable Carol Higbee, an Atlantic County Superior Court judge who is overseeing more than 1,000 mesh cases reports Digital Journal (here).

The ruling was issued July 19, 2012, one day before a landmark ruling in another mesh case in California against C.R. Bard that resulted in a $5.5 million favorable verdict for a Bakersfield woman injured by a transvaginal sling.

Former J & J Vice Chairman and current Avon CEO Sheri McCoy, and Ethicon Franchise head, Gary Pruden must also be produced for videotaped depositions in connection with vaginal mesh litigation. McCoy has a chemical engineering and M.B.A.background who was vying for the J & J CEO job which went to Gorsky last April.

The complaint filed by Plaintiffs’ attorneys (here) lays out the case against Ethicon.

Sheri McCoy, CEO Avon

Judge Higbee has also ordered executives’ computers be searched and any relevant information be turned over to lawyers for plaintiffs before the deposition are scheduled.  Former J&J CEO Bill Weldon will be deposed if there is any information uncovered in an electronic search of his computer that is relevant to the question of what executives knew about the complications concerning vaginal mesh and when they knew it.

What Did They Know – When Did They Know It

While J & J lawyers argued that executives have little knowledge of the dangers of transvaginal mesh, the depositions may reveal just how high up in the corporation the marketing of transvaginal mesh continued despite the numerous defective product calls that have been reported to J & J as well as the FDA.

Ethicon’s Women’s Health and Urology makes Gynemesh products for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) which uses Prolene Mesh, the proprietary name for polypropylene, a petroleum product used to make hernia and gynecological mesh.

The Litigation

In September, 2005, the company began to market and sell a mesh known as Prolift, used for anterior, posterior or total repair. By 2008, Ethicon began marketing a mesh known as Prolift +M, a total repair system. Ethicon also markets TVT for stress incontinence as well as TVT-O, and TVT-S.

Ethicon continues to market surgical vaginal mesh products to the medical community as safe, effective and reliable however the complaint (here) says that contrary to the representations, Ethicon’s pelvic mesh products have a high failure, injury and complication rate, resulting in irreversible injuries, re-operations and the company has failed to design and establish a safe, effective procedure for the removal of mesh.

“The Defendants intentionally, recklessly, and maliciously misrepresented the safety, risks, and benefits of the Defendants’ Pelvic Mesh Products, understating the risks and exaggerating the benefits in order to advance their own financial interests, with wanton and willful disregard for the rights and health of the Plaintiffs.”

The plaintiffs’ lawyers say Ethicon violated state consumer laws that protect the public from

“unfair, deceptive, fraudulent, and unconscionable trade and business practices and false advertising, by knowingly and falsely representing that the Defendants’ Pelvic Mesh Products were fit to be used for the purpose for which they were intended, when in fact they were defective and dangerous, and by other acts alleged herein. These representations were made in marketing and promotional materials.”

“Defendants had actual knowledge of the defective and dangerous condition of the Defendants’ Pelvic Mesh Products and failed to take any action to cure such defective and dangerous conditions.”

Gorsky Compelled to be Deposed in Risperdal Case

Lawyers for J & J said insisted Gorsky has no knowledge but lawyers for the Plaintiff say, a court should prevent the deposition of a high-ranking corporate official only “when it is clear that the information which plaintiff wants is available through other employees.  J & J cannot meet this high standard.”

In January 2009, Mr. Gorsky testified in a Texas state court case in which it was alleged that J &J marketed the antipsychotic drug, Risperdal, for off-label uses.

In April of this year, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion to compel the deposition of Mr. Gorsky in litigation involving Risperdal, illegally marketed to nursing homes for dementia patients and marketed for off-label use. Mr. Gorsky was the VP of Marketing for Janssen, the pharmaceutical division that oversaw Risperdal which was distributed off-label through Omnicare, a healthcare provider that allegedly received illegal payments from J & J to use and recommend Risperdal.

The company was fined $1.1 billion after the Department of Justice found it was hiding dangers of the drug and illegally marketing it for off-label uses.

BusinessWeek (here) has more on the DOJ deposition.

More background on Bill Weldon in this NYT piece, February 24, 2002 (here).

MDND background story on Alex Gorsky (here).

ATRA Calls Atlantic County Superior Court a Judicial Hellhole

The American Tort Reform Association, an anti-lawyer, pro-business interest lobbying group in 2009 ranked the Atlantic County Superior Court, where Judge Carol Higbee presides, the fourth worst Judicial Hellhole in the country (here). In 2011 its ranking lowered to the Watch List.  Since drug companies make up the backbone of the New Jersey economy, they are particularly sensitive to losses in state courts.  ATRA calls this “unfair treatment” which earns the state court ranking.

ATRA is about (here) supporting business and the lobbying group says lawsuits are  bad for business, especially when the injured party, the plaintiff, wins. #

By | 2012-07-29T23:11:05+00:00 July 29th, 2012|Media Reports|5 Comments

About the Author:

I’m National News Editor, Jane Akre and I began Mesh Medical Device News Desk aka Mesh News Desk (MND) in the summer of 2011 just after the Food and Drug Administration issued an explicit warning to the public that complications associated with surgical mesh used for prolapse repair (POP) and incontinence (SUI) are NOT rare! That was the starting point for the litigation you see today and thousands of lawsuits have been filed by women whose lives have been altered, some permanently, by the use of this petroleum-based product.


  1. Linda Dodson July 30, 2012 at 5:25 pm - Reply

    What I don’t understand is WHY has the Department of Justice NOT been involved and FORCED the FDA to ENFORCE the RECALL of ALL of these mesh medical devices? All one needs to do is read the FDA rules and regulations. The FDA has the power to issue recalls when they are aware that a product can and will cause harm. WHY is the FDA NOT protecting innocent consumers from deadly and harmful medical devices??

  2. Patty Williams July 31, 2012 at 3:34 am - Reply

    Im so glad to see this! It gives me hope. Funny that the manufacturers of other meshes have been notified of death, serious injury and disability in patients after their products are implanted . They continue to market them as safe. They continue to pretend that injuries are only about 20% of those who have their mesh. That number is too high. It should be zero. In our business ( which we closed due to my husbands horrible outcome after being implanted with mesh) if a customer had a problem, we fixed it. Losing one customer is one too many. I suppose we were not a multi million dollar company, but we had built our business from our own blood and sweat. Looks like the mesh companies have built their business on their “victims” blood and sweat.

  3. EH August 25, 2012 at 6:53 pm - Reply

    Fined 1.1 billion, and I bet they didn’t blink an eye. Ethics are not involved – greed is! Of course he knew (and many others in this company) – he just wanted to keep “plausible deniability”. I’m so sick of surgery to get this crap out. So tired of one more thing to try. So frustrated from my recliner life. So angry that no one seems to care – even though so many reports put severe complication rates over 12%, which I believe was the Depuy recall percentage. Must not have been as profitable – or were they forced by the FDA? No amount of money will give me my life back – and how dare they put a value on anyone of us – we’re all priceless and precious. I think this is the worst part of the body that can be hurt – it’s involved in everything and casting it won’t help. At some point these “professionals” became just as bad as any of the shooters who have done mass maiming and killing in various schools and work places. We’re horrified by that – and we should be. Causing someone to be maimed and in pain for life, knowingly, for a medical issue that wasn’t life threatening is disgusting. And maybe they’re worse – they’re profiting off of this. But they wear nice suits, and don’t brandish a gun – just use the Dr.’s as their weapons. We just became “victims” in a sterile operating room – I suppose that makes it OK. Thank you Jane for this website and shame on the media for not reporting the truth! Venting . . . yes.

    • Jane Akre August 27, 2012 at 4:06 pm - Reply

      Hi EH- I am amazed that more are not reporting on this important issue…. Thanks for writing. I’m back after a brief break to move etc….so let’s keep at it so the voices can be heard!

  4. Mikey Faulds September 1, 2012 at 8:23 pm - Reply

    I watched my Husband , Del, go thru 6 Colon Surgeries, the last an Iliostomy, but 4 of those unnecessary. He was always released from the Hospitals bleeding from the Rectum or the Colon ? That happened between ’07 -’09 & in Dec ’09 he had 2 Exploritory Surgeries to find out why he was so Bloated & bleeding ? I finally insisted to have him Life lighted to Portland, OR. where they found his Heart 1/2 full of fluid, both lungs 2/3 full also. They gave him Lasec & thank God got that taken care of, but it took 3 mo for him to get strength enough to walk & come back home. Upon arriving home, our Family Dr., refused to let me in with my husband at his appmnt, but I inssist so he refussed to see us. The next day we both got Certified Letters from the Clinic sa ing we could no longer go there., Period !! I called other Drs. at the only other Clinic in Town, but they wouldn’t let us go there either & haven’t since he came home from Portland 2/10. I have Epilepsy & can’t drive, so if he gets down again & I can’t drive him to our Dr. who is 50 mi round trip now, we’re in trouble. Our new Dr. took one look at Dels’ 6 Hernias’ stomach, & said “Oh Shit, who did that to you ??” He’s going to look into it, but we’re not expecting much to happen, because we tried to Sue the Dr, that did all those Surgeries, But didn’t do any good, because no Dr. would back us on it naturally ! Not even the Medical Board would do anything ! Even tho that Dr has left Surgical tools in the Stomach of a friend of ours, & he had to be Life lighted also, another bled to death., lost limb. Del, also is having trouble with his 6 & 7 th starting,Hernias all over his belly & lower area when that iliostomy was. They are painful, & he has to push them back in & is wearing a broad elastic band, that is so uncomfortable. & painful. He also is on Pain pills . Our new Dr. is talking about Surgery for him to remove all the 6 Hernias’, but after reading all this article, I’m not so sure I want him to. He was scared to do so anyway, but doubt if he will now, but I’ll leave it up to him ? I just wish there were some way we could ALL SUE those Drs. & Manufactures’ that got rich using people like us as genie pigs , maiming them for life.!!

Leave A Comment