Day One for Boston Scientific's Pinnacle Mesh Kit

//Day One for Boston Scientific's Pinnacle Mesh Kit

Day One for Boston Scientific's Pinnacle Mesh Kit

Gavel  500Judge Joseph Goodwin was dwarfed by enormity of the cavernous federal courtroom on the 13th floor of the Wilkie Ferguson courthouse in downtown Miami.

Goodwin, from Charleston WV, was filling a vacancy in another federal judge’s courtroom while his West Virginia court is the scene of another trial pitting four women against Boston Scientific over another of its products product, the Obtryx Mid-urethral sling.

It didn’t help matter that the judge had developed a cold. He occasionally sneezed into a tissue and looked quite miserable.

With 67,000 cases now amassed in West Virginia, consolidated in multidistrict litigation, Judge Goodwin has had no choice but to put together the cases of four women at a time, all with similar questions of fact posed to the nine-person jury.

Did Boston Scientific make and market a defective product and were its instructions to doctors, the end users, inadequate for the women to be planted with the Pinnacle Pelvic Mesh kit.

The jury weighed in loud and clear in September during the last trial in a Dallas courtroom delivering an unprecedented $73.5 million loss for the company.

Judge Joseph Goodwin

Judge Joseph Goodwin

The morning was spent picking jurors. There would eventually be nine – three black and one white woman and five men, some with Hispanic surnames. Judge Goodwin was the Southern gentleman explaining to the jurors the difference between federal court and their state courts.  He also shared a recipe for salsa.

During the selection process, Judge Goodwin was seething when one prospective juror told the courtroom her opinion. Her husband, a doctor, had been sued multiple times and these women were not injured; they were looking for a payday!

“Thank you,” he said dismissing her from jury duty. Later he told the court he wished he could force that woman to watch the trial so she’d know what the issue was all about.


Jim Perdue, of Perdue and Kidd, Houston made the opening statement to the jury.

Plaintiffs Amal Eghnayem, Juana Betancourt, Maria Nunez, and Margarita Dotres sat in the first row on the plaintiffs’ side. Two of the women are Spanish speakers and needed interpreters who quietly spoke into headsets on the other end of the room.

Perdue said the evidence will show that Boston Scientific, like every corporation, has a responsibility not to expose the public to a needless risk in order to sell its products. The proof will show Boston Scientific (BSC) ignored that duty and made the choice not to tell anyone about the risks of the Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair kit.

Launched in 2005, documents showed during a meeting in November of that year, BSC green lighted the Pinnacle in order to fast-track it to market.

“BSC is losing market share, let’s make a knockoff of Perigee and let’s get this done quickly” ~ inner office document from Boston Scientific

Perigee is the mesh kit made by competitor American Medical Systems and was considered first in the marketplace. Johnson & Johnson had the Prolift kit for pelvic organ prolapse already on the market. Boston Scientific was last to launch.

Mesh kits are the largest medical device to hold back prolapsing organs, a condition known as pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Pinnacle would eventually have bragging rights- it offered 105% coverage of the pelvic floor, the largest among competitors.

“Speed is A#1” the document continued.

Let’s not go with the biologic material decided the team because it would “increase launch time” and “add complexities.”

Opening Arguments

Jim Perdue, Perdue Kidd

Jim Perdue, Perdue Kidd

Plaintiffs’ attorney, Jim Perdue (Perdue and Kidd)  delivered to the jury the opening arguments on behalf of the four women. The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) as front and center as it has been in other mesh cases.

The MSDS contains warnings about chemical preparations so workers and material handlers know how to handle the chemicals with caution. Polypropylene (pp) mesh is a resin polymer which is obtained from various sources and sent to processing plants where it is blended with additives to create resin pellets that are sold to mesh makers.

In this case, the raw material came from Chevron Phillips, a petroleum company.   Polypropylene (pp) is a petroleum by-product. The mesh made for Boston Scientific was also known as Marlex, or MarFlex HHM TR-130. It is the same basic polymer used to make the majority of synthetic pelvic mesh and hernia mesh implants.

Perdue showed the jurors the MSDS contains a warning that the polypropylene was not appropriate to put in permanently implanted medical devices.

Specifically it says:

The MSDS says “Do not use this Chevron Phillips chemical material in medical applications involving brief or temporary implantation in the human body or contact with internal body fluids or tissues unless the material has been provided directly from chevron Phillips chemical under a contract which expressly acknowledges the contemplated use.”

Chevron Philips was uncomfortable that BSC might be using the mesh for medical applications and Perdue showed a purchase contract from 2006. It said BSC had the responsibility to ensure the pp is suited to the correct application.

Despite the promises by the company, BSC never had time to test the Pinnacle Pelvic Mesh kits before the sold it to the public.   Perdue said there were no clinical trials and no animal testing. Only post-market trials were conducted by doctors who were hired by Boston Scientific to conduct sponsored studies.


The Defense

Molly Craig, Hood Law

Molly Craig, Hood Law

Molly Craig of Hood Law of Charleston, South Carolina introduced herself to the jury and introduced her team, lawyers from shook Hardy & Bacon of Kansas City, Missouri.

They all needed surgical options, they all needed to have mesh, she insisted.

“Thank goodness there are treatment options for POP. It is a terrible condition.” ~ attorney Molly Craig

The plaintiffs must prove by the preponderance of evidence each claim. Despite the fact that the plaintiffs get to make their case first, Craig asked jurors to consider both sides. “There are both sides of a story before you make a decision.”


First Witness

The case must move quickly and a videotaped deposition of sales rep Even Brasington was the first witness. Now a WorldWide Marketing VP for BSC, Brasington was shown notes from a national sales meeting in 2010.

“Our #1 goal is to outsmart our competitors and take share. It’s about winning!”

Not a consistent message with #1 in patient safety is it, he was asked by the attorney on the video. Brasington answered that the message at a national sales meeting is to fire up sales reps so they are motivated.

ProteGen was the first Boston Scientific product to ever hit the market. By 1999 it was recalled for not performing as expected but the failure led to a ProteGen Recall Task Force inside the company. BSC would learn lessons from the failure, or at least that was the intention – Test future products before they go to market. Did BSC do that with the Pinnacle? Not prior to launch, said Brasington.

On cross examination, the defense did not do itself many favors. On video, an attorney’s voice off camera asked what marketing does? They uncover clinical unmet needs in the market. How do they do that? By establishing relationships with key market leaders or thought leaders, also known as preceptors. Dr. Dennis Miller’s name was introduced.

A urogynecologist from Wisconsin, Dr. Miller is long known to be a preceptor ofr trainer of other doctors in a consulting capacity for industry. Former with Ethicon (J&J), Miller went to BSC to push the Pinnacle pelvic mesh kit, his own invention of a unique delivery system for the mesh. The VP of marketing agreed Dr. Miller received royalties from BSC due to his patent of the Pinnacle.

Second Witness

Also appearing on videotape Phillip Ratcliff appeared. He was the marketing manager of Women’s health for BSC. By mid 2005, Johnson & Johnson, C.R. Bard and AMS were eroding BSC sales with their synthetic meshes. J&J had the Prolift, AMS had the Apogee and Perigee. Ratcliff’s job would be to fill the holes by developing synthetic mesh to compete.

Develop a “Quick knock-off Perigee with benefits” was the goal identified to “Plug holes in their portfolio” documents showed. Big average selling price and Big margins. What were the margins of cost to price for the Pinnacle? In the 80% range, he answered.

On November 7, 2005 a memo shown on the screen listed the priority, “Speed is #1.


Learn More:

Three Trials in One day!, Mesh News Desk November 2, 2014

Background on ProteGen

Protegen: the Grandmother of them All


By | 2014-11-04T08:31:13+00:00 November 4th, 2014|News|14 Comments

About the Author:

I’m National News Editor, Jane Akre and I began Mesh Medical Device News Desk aka Mesh News Desk (MND) in the summer of 2011 just after the Food and Drug Administration issued an explicit warning to the public that complications associated with surgical mesh used for prolapse repair (POP) and incontinence (SUI) are NOT rare! That was the starting point for the litigation you see today and thousands of lawsuits have been filed by women whose lives have been altered, some permanently, by the use of this petroleum-based product.


  1. Jan Urban November 4, 2014 at 12:35 pm - Reply

    Can you hear me now comes to mind. Judge Goodwin is listening, if only he could force the the world to watch a trial, or even just the Doctor’s who blindly put these devices in our bodies, who now ignore us and the pain we suffer. I went to the ER last week after I had my exploratory. I had been bleeding from the rectum for a day and when I mentioned I had TVT Exact Sling. They all quickly said they do not deal with Mesh? What does that mean? Any how, I’m glad that Judge Goodwin is listening.

  2. Mary pat November 4, 2014 at 1:20 pm - Reply

    “They do not deal with mesh!” How do you like being treated like lepers!

    Jane, thank you for your unrelentless efforts. God bless you! If they could stick us all in a leper colony on an island somewhere the world would never know….. Except for Jane Akre. She gets the word out!

  3. Jeneane November 4, 2014 at 2:25 pm - Reply

    It is very unsettling to me that members of a jury are chosen that can not even understand the language,and the jurer who’s husband is a doctor you just have no idea. Yes, you are correct this is a payday for us to some degree, because after numerous surgeries and the pain that we still endure. Life is difficult, it is hard to go to work , I still have pain, I still leak. I can not have enjoyable sex with my husband of 31 year because of urine leakage. You can not eat or drink to certain things because they may cause you leak.My kidney function has been effect because of this along with many other issues. Did I ask for this. No I did not. But more importantly, I should have been told right away so that I could of had the chose to remove the sling. Instead it was inside of me distroying my organs. So you say it is all about the payday, no that is only a small part of it justice is another. I would hope that slings are done away with in the future.

  4. Disgusted November 4, 2014 at 2:50 pm - Reply

    Yes Judge Goodwin does seem to be getting it. Too bad he can’t go back and un-ring some bells. Not allowing punitive damages etc. Hopefully this will stop. Too bad it’s been over a decade so far. There are going to be many more issues in the next decade and more. So sad. They knew what they were doing and did it anyway – prison should be mandated. I’ve been told by Dr.’s that mesh doesn’t cause pain. Run the other way.

  5. Brenda November 4, 2014 at 4:38 pm - Reply

    Are the mesh law suits only for women who were vaginally implanted with the mesh, as my Ethicon product was implanted by way of RASC (Robotically Assisted Abdominal Sacrocopolpexy), and I am being told the litigation is in regard to vaginally implanted products only.

    • Jane Akre November 4, 2014 at 6:26 pm - Reply

      I believe that is correct Brenda… vaginal placement also known as transvaginal mesh.

  6. Sandy November 5, 2014 at 9:19 am - Reply

    I would gladly give up a settlement if they could put me back the way I was before the mesh. I was not looking for any kind of a pay day. I was making good money. Dreaming of the future, enjoying my family and my life. Now I live in pain every day. In January I have to have a surgery that I have been told is extremely painful for months and will take me years to find out how I will end up. The next year of my life if I can handle it will be hell!!! A pay day is something I would give up but I have been told I will live in some kind of pain the rest of my life.

    I have had test after test to show I have PN damage. A pay day after what the doctor and medical company did to me I do deserve a pay day. They have destroyed my life as I knew it. If this was a car accident or any other kind injury caused by some one else it would be a slam dunk! You caused you pay. So my dear who’s husband is a doctor pay up if he knew the dangers and never told his patient. Pay who you damaged instead of buying that new car. I would have respect to anyone who was man or woman enough to say we messed up I will make it right. But I don’t think there are any people left like that who are involved in this issue.

  7. Anna Cantu November 5, 2014 at 1:50 pm - Reply

    I WILL AMEN THAT SANDY! I have made the comment many times that I would give up a hand or arm if I could have my organs back the way they should be…I would gladly take a new body in place of a few measly dollars that I will ultimately give back to doctors and insurance companies.

    I went to pain management once since the entire medical profession doesn’t want to deal with me…I had the standard urine tests, etc…and got the lowdown on how many shots I will need in my spine *nothing is wrong with my spine btw! Got the bill the other day…I owe them 350 dollars just for the urinalysis/drug testing….looking at the bill I almost pee’d my pants (more than usual)…the entire bill was over 1200 dollars for URINE TESTS! And I am supposed to do that each and every month if I want a little relief??? I just cry every day over my pain and the toll it took on my young life. In my late 30’s I was damaged irreparably and will have to learn to live with this somehow, with or without pain meds and other surgeries…so ….MONEY….HEALTH….I would also choose my health back GLADLY!

    Thinking I may try to see a doctor that was mentioned on this website in Texas…

    • Kitty November 5, 2014 at 8:09 pm - Reply

      Hello Sandy What is the reason you have to have urine tests?

  8. Sandy November 6, 2014 at 2:49 pm - Reply

    Kitty I am not the one who mentioned urine test I believe that was Anna but I did have them too. You see doctors have no clue around here about PND. They want to blame it on urinary tract infections or something else. When I would call and tell them I was in terrible pain they would have me come in and see if I had an infection. I believe this was about 6-7 times over a year. Like I said I have tried every things and have been through more test than I can name. I wishi could wake up from this nightmare.

  9. Janet B November 6, 2014 at 9:25 pm - Reply

    Dr. Dennis Miller, the doctor who removed my mesh, still pushes it on women and insists he “has never had a complication” when in fact at least 6 of us have compared notes and know he is lying. Makes sense now that we see how financially tied he is to Boston Scientific. Makes my stomach turn to know that he is still maiming women with this horrible product.

    • Jane Akre November 7, 2014 at 7:45 am - Reply

      Could the six of you compare notes anonymously if need by, for a story? I appreciate your participation.

      • Janet B November 7, 2014 at 3:32 pm - Reply

        We do communicate with each other via email, and a few of us are also on facebook. I can check with the others to see if they’d be able to participate in something like this. I wouldn’t think the attorneys would mind as long as we were not named.

        • Janet B November 12, 2014 at 3:52 pm - Reply

          Any patient of Dr. Dennis Miller who would like to join our group discussion, please contact me at

Leave A Comment