Batiste v Ethicon: Pelvic Mesh Survivor Takes the Stand

//Batiste v Ethicon: Pelvic Mesh Survivor Takes the Stand

Batiste v Ethicon: Pelvic Mesh Survivor Takes the Stand

Aaron Horton

Aaron Horton

Most of  Mesh News Desk readers are familiar with The Mesh Warrior, Aaron Horton has been spending some time in the Dallas courtroom to watch the proceedings of Batiste v. Ethicon as it enters its second week. 

The Plaintiffs rested Wednesday but not before L.B. took the stand. Aaron  shares her observations with Mesh News Desk.

Thank you Aaron! 

“Yesterday afternoon, plaintiff’s counsel formally rested after Mrs. Batiste’s testimony and Ethicon’s cross examination of her.  While on the stand, her demeanor was poised and calm, albeit understandably nervous.

Aaron and Linda

Aaron and Linda

Linda Batiste (L.B.) has spent the majority of her 64 years in Dallas. On January 12, 2011 she was implanted with an Ethicon TVT-O at the Baylor Medical Center to treat stress urinary incontinence.  Jurors in this trial are allowed to take notes and appear to be very interested. There are seven male and seven female jurors.

She was asked about her injuries including vaginal erosion of the mesh, dyspareunia, leg/groin pain and when her specific symptoms related to the implant occurred.  Ethicon’s defense team has often brought up the plaintiff’s concurrent medical conditions which include diabetes, multiple back surgeries, two previous strokes, other gynecological diagnoses, and a battle with mental health on and off over her lifetime.

N. Kay Karen Deming, attorney for Ethicon

N. Kay Karen Deming, attorney for Ethicon

Ethicon brought back the female attorney. N. Kay Deming from Atlanta (Troutman Sanders LLP)  for the cross-examination of Ms. Batiste.  Deming has only presented for opening arguments and now for the cross-examination of Ms. Batiste.  She has not been present for every day of the trial. She has a shoulder injury, which she has pointed out to the jury on more than one occasion.  I wonder if she has a medical device implanted.  I don’t know.  I do know that she seems to be making her injury obvious to the jury by calling it out often, verbally and nonverbally, though she’s only presented twice.

Ethicons’s legal strategy seems to be follow the same formula we’ve seen from them before: focusing on the plaintiff’s other conditions as possible causes for her pelvic pain and injury.  Ethicon’s attorneys also asked several questions about the medications Ms. Batiste had been on throughout her life and currently, citing that some of the medications she is taking also have the possibility to cause some of her symptoms.

L.B. remains calm, but her facial expression belies her demeanor.  It says to me, “Really? You think somehow I don’t know the difference between the pain caused from my implant and pain unrelated to that?”  I don’t blame her.  The cross-examination of Ms. Batiste lasts a little more than an hour, and she held up well.  I hugged her at recess and told her she was a very strong woman.

Also during the lunch recess, when the jury was not present, Ethicon made an appeal to the judge to enter into evidence more of Ms. Batiste’s personal history. Judge Molberg denied their appeals to admit this information into court, saying, “The appeals court is on the second floor,” to the objecting attorney for Ethicon, who was Mr. Noteware.  I choose not to disclose the details of Mr. Noteware’s request because I find it to be so heinous a request that I won’t repeat it.

Piet Hinoul, Ethicon from Linda Gross trial

Piet Hinoul, Ethicon from Linda Gross trial

The first witness called after the plaintiff’s counsel formally rested was Dr. Hinoul, the Belgian Medical Director for Ethicon who was overseeing the TVT-O development, and J&J’s Gynecare/Women’s Health division at the time of the product’s marketing.

Dr. Hinoul continued on the stand this morning with examination and cross examination. #


By | 2014-03-29T00:41:23+00:00 March 29th, 2014|Legal News|4 Comments

About the Author:

I’m National News Editor, Jane Akre and I began Mesh Medical Device News Desk aka Mesh News Desk (MND) in the summer of 2011 just after the Food and Drug Administration issued an explicit warning to the public that complications associated with surgical mesh used for prolapse repair (POP) and incontinence (SUI) are NOT rare! That was the starting point for the litigation you see today and thousands of lawsuits have been filed by women whose lives have been altered, some permanently, by the use of this petroleum-based product.


  1. Annie March 29, 2014 at 1:31 am - Reply

    You know what’s is upsetting. Yes sometimes women have had other surgeries like in my case due to a twisted colon but this mesh has really screwed me up. I’m sad . In terrible pain that at times feels like labor cramps. I can feel this mesh moving around it pinches pokes stabs and I’ve been under constant care by a pain specialist . I have pain in my groin that goes into my thigh and buttox , it has caused me to have sacroiliac instability. I am going on my third injection I have only gotten minimal relief. Sometimes I think I’m dying from this. I have had infection after infection several hospital stays. I feel my private sore and its no joke I pace the floor at night I can’t sleep due to bad pain. So I feel that yes we might have had or have other problems that started right after mesh surgery but it does not mean that the mesh was not at fault. It is very much at fault. I have proof. God bless this lady and all the others suffering like me.

  2. Ginger March 29, 2014 at 1:32 am - Reply

    Well Aaron just like a good book I want to read more but …..I have to sleep…lol you have done an excellent job

    • Jane Akre March 29, 2014 at 2:13 am - Reply

      Yes she has, thank you Aaron!

  3. Carmel Berry March 30, 2014 at 6:56 pm - Reply

    Thanks Aaron ! Great writing… looking forward to more.

Leave A Comment