June 28, 2016, Mesh Medical Device News Desk ~ Update on Pelvic Mesh Trials Naming Defendant J&J
What has happened to pelvic mesh trials?
For a while the defective product pelvic mesh trials were scheduled in rapid succession.
Trials were conducted naming the major defendants - Ethicon, Boston Scientific, C.R. Bard and were held in federal court in Charleston WV, Massachusetts, Dallas, in California and New Jersey. In the majority of cases, the verdicts for and jury awards to the plaintiffs ran into the millions of dollars.
Then settlements began, quietly, covertly and much too slowly.
Byrd federal court, Charleston WV
AMS began settling cases when it faced financial trouble and a sale to Endo. C.R. Bard announced some settlements as did Boston Scientific. But four years after formation of the federal multidistrict litigation in Charleston, WV, where 93,000 cases are consolidated and waiting for trials - litigation has largely stopped.
Judge Joseph Goodwin
Judge Joseph Goodwin hoped to push both sides toward settlement and promised neither would like his future rulings.
The settlement dollars have been slow to be issued or so paltry that after legal fees and liens are paid, may not cover even one year much less a lifetime of medical care that may be needed.
Women have died, become homeless and are running out of options.
Besides one reported settlement, Johnson & Johnson continues to hold out and vows to continue in court.
That may change as defense and plaintiffs are in a head-on collision course to another succession of trials beginning in August.
NO MORE TEARS Johnson & Johnson Ahead
Beginning in August and through the rest of this year and into next, J&J and its Ethicon division will face a barrage of trials.
Most are filed in Philadelphia in the Court of Common Pleas. Ten cases are set for trial, according to the docket and the plaintiffs are represented by Kline & Specter of Philadelphia.
More on the Philadelphia trials in a moment, but the next pelvic mesh trial is set for federal court in Charleston WV.
TVT-O from TVT Meshed Up, UK
TVT-O from beckenbodenzentrummuenster.de
EDWARDS V ETHICON, (Case No. 2:12-cv-09972), Friday, August 12 is jury selection, trial commences Monday, August 15, 2016, 8:30 a.m. Pretrial conference July 21, 2016 to explore any final options such as settlement.
The defendant corporation is Ethicon, a division of Johnson & Johnson, the manufacturer facing the largest number of mesh cases (33,557 on the docket) consolidated in this federal court among seven manufacturers. Ms T. Edwards of Georgia, and her husband are the plaintiffs.
This is the fifth delay for this trial. Attorneys are Mark Mueller, John Fabry, Breanne Vandermeer for Ms. Edwards and Christy Jones and Dave Thomas for Ethicon.
Ms. Edwards was implanted with a TVT-O by Dr. Harold Wittcoff. Court documents show Ethicon attorneys, want to exclude the expert opinion of Dr. John T. Steege, who would testify TVT-O was defective and caused her present day pain.
Dr. Elizabeth Kavaler, from Linda Gross case
Defense experts include Dr. Elizabeth Kavaler, previously seen in the Gross trial, to issue a report as well as Dr. Stanley Zaslau.
A List of Exhibits and witnesses includes the Patent by De Leval, an email chain including Piet Hinoul involving an IFU rewrite, an email chain about TVT complaints alleging brittle mesh and blue shi*, and a list of hundreds of other exhibits, many seen in other Ethicon trials.
The case was filed December 31, 2012.
This trial is limited to six days writes Judge Goodwin in a June 12, 2015 order. Edwards v. Ethicon, see the Complaint here.
BACKGROUND - The TVT-O has already been found to be defective in this same courtroom before Judge Joseph Goodwin in the Huskey v. Ethicon trial. See the background story here. Also in the Linda Batiste case in Dallas in April 2014, the jury concluded the TVT-O made by Ethicon was defective and awarded Ms. Batiste $1.2 million. See the story here.
Meanwhile, Waves of cases will be heard in groups and are currently on a pre-trial schedule heading for trial in Charleston federal court.
Photo by T. Rogers
MULLINS V. JOHNSON & JOHNSON/ ETHICON , (Case No.2:12-CV-02952), Mullins completion of pretrial should be June 30, 2016 and a trial date can then be set according to Judge Goodwin’s order of March 15. PTO #217.
Mullins complaint, July 11, 2012, U.S. District Court, Southern District WV. Background story on MND here.
This is a trial of 37 plaintiffs appearing at one time before Judge Goodwin in Charleston, WV. All of the plaintiffs had been implanted with Johnson & Johnson’s TVT (transvaginal tape) and all are from West Virginia. Even though different implanting doctors are involved, the injuries are similar enough to consolidate them into one case before Judge Goodwin in this multidistrict litigation.
Dr. D. Veronikis
As of now, deposition is set for Dr. Dionysios Veronikis, M.D. for July 11, 2016 in St. Louis pertaining to his treatment of four women, and the deposition of Dr. Jerry G. Blaivas, M.D. on July 7th in New York City, related to two plaintiffs.
Confidential shredding, Lomac.co.uk
In a filing June 27, 2016, plaintiffs ask to amend the original complaint and include the spoliation issue to case which is recognized under West Virginia law to be a stand-alone issue.
J&J purportedly destroyed hundreds of thousands of documents that were related to mesh litigation before any trials were heard. Plaintiffs have since determined that more instances of purported spoliation have occurred since it was first revealed. See PTO#100 Doc #1069 Feb. 4, 2014 on spoliation.
On Monday, Judge Joseph Goodwin granted plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave and to Amend the Complaint to add spoliation issue (Doc #821). Plaintiffs want to depose Ronald L Rink who oversaw the human resources files and documents that were part of the Ethicon Global Production.
This consolidated case will focus on design defect. Defective warning, breach of warranty may be added to this case. The Defendant wants the plaintiffs to have to prove a safer design alternative design existed as part of a design defect claim.
You may recall that pre-trial order #214 had to do with the parameters set for the Defense to conduct the medical examinations of the women in Wave One. See the story here.
ALSO NEXT UP Boston Scientific- Dallas
Figueroa v Boston Scientific, September 12, 2016, 8:30 am, (DC-13-03145), Dallas, Texas, before Judge Ken Molberg.
This case is in settlement mode, though has not settled yet and is still on the docket. Ms. Y. Figueroa is also suing the doctor Celso Hernandez MD and Baylor Surgicare at Mansfield LLC. Dallas. On June 4, 2011 she was implanted with a Solyx SIS pelvic mesh for incontinence by Dr. Hernandez for SUI. Proxy Biomedical Ltc. An Irish company, Manufactures PP mesh component but is not subject to the jurisdiction of this court.
PART TWO- PHILADELPHIA IS THE STAGE FOR 10 UPCOMING PELVIC MESH TRIALS INVOLVING DEFENDANT J&J